But the Masonic symbolism of the tragedy continues in efforts of reconciliation at which survivor Stephen Travers was met by ‘The Craftsman’.

Craftsman is another word for Freemason.

Before the Ministry of Defence finally admitted to the involvement of Captain Nairac in the Miami Showband Massacre the establishment authorities and Historical Enquiries Team spent years denying it.

Stephen Travers in his search for truth about the British Officer, who attended the Miami Showband Massacre, before Captain Robert Nairac’s involvement had (despite his actual proven whereabouts on the UK mainland) been officially ‘confirmed’ by the Ministry of Defence, says in the Netflix documentary:

“The more I learned, the more I realised that there was something glaringly obvious – the British officer that had arrived at the scene – and I began to think that maybe the reason that this British officer is being dismissed out of hand on so many occasions is that, it’s not that he wasn’t relevant, it’s because he was very relevant.”

Stephen Travers, ‘ReMastered: The Miami Showband Massacre’ Netflix Documentary, 22nd March 2019, 38m:38s – 39m:02s [ Archived here ]

…Travers continues:

“I needed to find another source of information the H.E.T [Historical Inquiries team] was not going to give me any answers about the British Officer so I realised I needed to find another source of information. The obvious people we needed to talk to were the people who had been jailed who had actually committed the crime, Crozier and MacDowell. At this stage they were released as part of the peace process[…]

To get to them we would need permission from the leadership of the organisation that they part of, the UVF, the Ulster Volunteer Force. You don’t find the UVF in the Yellow Pages, you can’t just dial the operator and say can you put me through to the UVF please, but I remembered that there was a friend of Fran O’Toole’s and I heard he had been involved in the Peace Process, as a sort of liaison between the UVF and the British and Irish governments.”

Ibid. 41m.31s – 42m.42s

That Liaison, Rev Chris Hudson continues:

“Stephen Travers contacted me and had read a lot about the work I had done with Loyalist paramilitaries in Northern Ireland and he felt I might be able to open a door for him.”

Ibid. Rev. Chris Hudson, 43m.40s – 43m.52s

..and so:

“[Rev. Hudson] came back and he told us, “look you won’t be allowed to meet Crozier and MacDowell but there’s a possibility I can get you a meeting with the leadership of the UVF, and what they always say is the ‘second in command’”.

The code name was to be ‘The Craftsman’”

Ibid. Stephen Travers, 43m.11s – 43m.13s

…so is there any symbolic significance behind such an unusual name?

The name ‘craftsman’ is usually associated with the gentle pursuit of mastering the use of tools to shape an idea into form from clay, wood, metal, stone and the like.

How could such a name as ‘craftsman’ be associated with the worst atrocities of the bloodiest internecine violence?

So why use such a name?

Well, it would appear that it was used because the term ‘Craftsman’ is simply another name for a ‘Freemason’, a name only generally known by other Freemasons, and especially to Freemasons of the higher degrees.

Among such people we find that the use of force through violence is apparently the accepted tool for shaping not wood or metal, clay or stone, as with a normal craftsman, but society itself, through the force of ritual violence:

The Craftsman and Freemason’s Guide Book. Source: Public Domain. Available from: Archive [ Archived here ]

The below quotations prove this fact:

“By thus doing his part in the reorganization of society….[Freemasons are] the Master Craftsmen of the universe!”

Manley P. Hall, p. 417, ‘Lectures on Ancient Philosophy’, 1929 via J. Edward Decker, ‘Freemasonry: The Doctrines of Darkness’, Pg 71 [ Archived here ] [Added Emphasis]

“Among worthy craftsmen,

Wherever assembled,

The knowledge of Masons

To spread far and wide.”

Masonic Initiation Rite- ‘Most Excellent Master’s Song’ by Thomas Smith Webb, from Duncan’s Masonic Ritual and Monitor, by Malcom C. Duncan, 1866 [ Archived here ] [Added Emphasis]

“I hereby solemnly and sincerely promise and swear that as a beginning Craftsman in the Masonry of the mind…”

H. L. Haywood, ‘The Newly-Made Mason’ via ‘The Secret Teachings of the Masonic Lodge’, Moody Publishers [ Archived here ] [Added Emphasis]

“The Freemasons trace their foundation to London in 1717. The Craft, as members call it, was based on a fraternal bond created by ritual and symbol.”

John Dickie, ‘What the Freemasons Taught the World About the Power of Secrecy’, Time, 13 August 2020 [ Archived here ]

“In Anglo-Saxon, craft meant cunning, skill, power, dexterity, etc. The word became applied to trades and occupations calling for trained skill on the part of those practicing it. The distinction between such trades and those not requiring trained workmen, so rigidly maintained, was one of the hallmarks of the Middle Ages. Freemasonry is called a Craft, partly for historical reasons, partly because, unlike so many fraternities, it requires a training (given in the form of initiation ceremonies) of those seeking its membership.”

‘A Masonic Dictionary’ [ Archived here ] [Added Emphasis]

“”Cunning” comes from the Old English term kenning, meaning “wise” or “knowledgeable.”

Other terms for cunning man and cunning woman are wise man, wise woman, sorcerer, wizard, conjurer, charmer, blesser, white witch and witch. Traditionally, cunning men and women came into their craft by heredity…”

Rosemary Ellen Guiley, ‘Cunning Man/Cunning Woman’, ‘The Encyclopedia of Witches, Witchcraft and Wicca’ via Occult World: Making the Invisible Visible Blog [ Archived here ] [Added Emphasis]

…and in the context of ritual violence apparently as the accepted tool for shaping society?

“…Freemasons applaud violence, terror and crime providing it is carried out in a crafty manner. One section of the (masonic) notes says humor is all-important and the most appalling crimes may be committed under its cloak. The one (Jack the) Ripper letter likely to have been genuine suggests that Jack the Ripper was going about his crimes in just this way, committing ghoulish murders with a Puckish sense of fun.

If Masonic supremacy appears in jeopardy, it is re-established by a show of strength, by crimes of violence, perpetrated to demonstrate… the far-reaching power of Freemasonry to initiates the world over…”

Stephen Knight, ‘Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution’, 1976, Pg. 163 [ Archived here ] [Added Emphasis]

The shaping of society as ghoulish ‘craft’ is carried out through strategic tension:

“It is probably fair to say that of the roughly seven billion people who live on our planet today, far less than one percent has ever heard of the “strategy of tension.” And only a very few of these could illustrate the strategy with specific historical examples. It is indeed a strategy of a shadow world, known only to a few military and intelligence officers (and some criminals) who have carried it out, a few police officers and judges who fought against it, and a handful of journalists and academics who have written about it.

In its essence, the strategy of tension targets the emotions of human beings and aims to spread maximum fear among the target group. “Tension” refers to emotional distress and psychological fear, whereas “strategy” refers to the technique of bringing about such distress and fear. A terrorist attack in a public place, such as a railway station, a market place, or a school bus, is the typical technique through which the strategy of tension is implemented. After the attack — and this is a crucial element — the secret agents who carried out the crime blame it on a political opponent by removing and planting evidence.

It must be noted that the targets of the strategy of tension are not the dead and the wounded of the terrorist attacks, as many might assume. The targets are the political opponents, who are discredited through the attack, and those who remain unharmed but learn of the attack, thereby coming to fear for their lives and those of their loved ones. Since the aims of the strategy are to discredit opponents and to create fear, the real targets are not the people who were killed, whether they number in the dozens or even thousands, but the millions of people who survive physically unharmed but emotionally distressed.”

Daniele Ganser (May 2014) Journal of 9/11 Studies, ‘Strategy of Tension’, WikiSpooks [ Archived here ]

This apparent symbolic ritual mockery of Stephen Travers in his quest for truth, in a reply apparently directed by the UK Crown intelligence, through its proxy death squad, the UVF, is an example of ‘hoodwinking’:

“Hoodwink (definition). A symbol of the secrecy, silence and darkness in which the mysteries of our art should be preserved from the unhallowed gaze of the profane.”

Albert G. Mackey M.D., Mason, Member of the 33rd Degree, foremost Masonic historian of the 19th century, writing in the ‘Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and its Kindred Sciences’, 1914, Pg 350 [ Archived here ]

…not to mention a Masonic Revelation of the Method:

“…the…Masonic “Revelation of the Method.”…alludes to the process wherein murderous deeds and hair-raising conspiracies …. and every manner of horror show are first buried beneath a cloak of secrecy… and then, when finally accomplished and secured, slowly revealed to the unsuspecting populace who watch…deep-frozen…as the hidden history is unveiled…”

Michael Hoffman II, ‘Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare’, 1992 Edition, Pg 36 [ Archived here ]

…which is, amongst other things, what appears to be an institutional, and psychopathological ‘duping delight’, which characterises the establishment cryptocracy. Duping delight is:

“[t]he near irresistible thrill some people feel in taking a risk and getting away with it. Sometimes it includes contempt for the target who is being so ruthlessly and successfully exploited. It is hard to contain duping delight; those who feel it want to share their accomplishments with others, seeking admiration for their exploits”

Paul Ekman, ‘Duping Delight: The Thrill of Lying’, December, 2009 [ Archived here ]

…and there is little doubt in light of what is known about collusion between the UK government, the SAS, Loyalist paramilitaries, the UDA, UVF especially in, of course the notorious ‘Glenanne Gang’ in their alleged role in numerous sectarian attacks including the Miami Showband Massacre, in their capacity as working as unofficial ‘death squads’ operating with impunity thanks to very top level of collusion with, and tactical collaboration with the Royal Ulster Constabulary, Ulster Defence Regiment, the UK Military, the SAS, and the intelligence services Mi5, Mi6 and GCHQ, that this interview was approved and overseen by such entities-their Masonic overlords.

“Contrary to what some in the alternative media suggest, Ireland, not Italy, is the birthplace of modern false-flag terror—specifically British Masonic false-flag terror. Around the world, many have heard of the IRA (Irish Republican Army), but few outside Ireland and Britain know of their ostensible adversaries in the Northern Irish “Troubles”, the British “Loyalist” paramilitaries. There’s a good reason for this: the global Anglo-Zionist Masonic global propaganda network succeeded in branding the Irish Troubles as a conflict between Irish nationalist fanatics and Northern Irish Protestants responding to the violence of these fanatics. But the Loyalist terror groups weren’t responding to violence from Irish nationalists: they instigated the violence…..And the Loyalists weren’t Irish either—they were British proxies. In fairness, they never claimed to be anything else, insisting always that they fought to maintain Northern Ireland as a British province.”

‘The Judaeo-Masonic Roots of Ulster British Loyalism’, Fitzpatrick Informer, 3rd August 2016 [ Archived here ]

So what happened at the meeting?

“‘The Crafts Man’ sat down and he took out hand written notes, probably about 8 or 9 pages, and he said, “I knew this day would come.”.”

Rev. Chris Hudson, Peace Negotiator, ‘ReMastered: The Miami Showband Massacre’ Netflix Documentary, 22nd March 2019, 43.40s – 43m.52s [ Archived here ]

However in an apparent attempt to deflect from suspicion about the apparent sacrificial aspect of the massacre, the appointed person denies completely the real version of events including what has already been admitted by the UVF that the British Army:

“…supplied…detonators…[used to massacre]…the Miami Showband…”

Ulster Volunteer Force Letter to Charles Haughey, 1987 [ Archived here ]

Ulster Volunteer Force Letter to Charles Haughey. 1987. Source: Public Domain. Available from: Twitter @JFForgotten [ Archived here ]

…thus apparently also deliberately sacrificing Loyalist paramilitaries alongside the Miami Showband.

However when speaking to Travers:

“‘The Craftsman’ told me that the intention was that we would be at home safely in bed and this bomb would have gone off and they would have put out a statement that they can reach into Dublin and into the heart of the Irish Republic…”

‘ReMastered: The Miami Showband Massacre’ Netflix Documentary, March 22, 2019

However in the above official UVF letter to Irish politician Charles Haughey Captain W Johnston who decommissioned the UVF’s armoury, thus enabling the success of the Peace Process contradicts the ‘craftsman’ when he states that:

“Mi5, Mi6 assisted by SA.S used our force 1972 to 1978, 1985…

Mi5 were double crossing us all the time we were working with them…

They supplied us with detonators which they had set to explode prematurely [killing] the Miami Showband, Somerville and Boyle…”

“…but I knew from the Scene of Crime Officer that it was a short term fuse, 10 to 15 minutes. This would have exploded, killing everybody on board.

I asked ‘The Crafts Man’ about the British officer and it was actually surprising; he didn’t deny there was a British officer there on the night. He said “he took some risk that Brit”, that is what he said to me.”

Ibid.

Screenshot. Loyalist spokesman greeting Stephen Travers. Source: Fair Use. Available from: ‘ReMastered: The Miami Showband Massacre’ Netflix Documentary

The Miami Showband Netflix documentary clearly shows the Loyalist spokesman greeting Stephen Travers with a surreptitious Masonic grip, showing the pointing finger sign of ‘the creator’:

‘Hand Signs’, Diagram. Source: Fair Use. Available from: Blogspot [ Archived here ]

So we are left with a numerous clusters of symbols which together tell us of:

“An “Occult Blind” is the concealment of hidden and symbolic meanings of secret arcane knowledge within couched terms of a “Secret Language”. Occult Blinds are used to satisfy those who might be idly curious or seeking power and influence over others and in seeking Occult Secrets will read advanced magical manuals but who will be tricked by believing the surface meaning of the carefully written text and will then leave satisfied thinking they have gained high level powerful knowledge and believing also that they understand the secrets of practical occultism. In this way through the use of the Secret Language the true meaning behind the Occult Blind is cunningly concealed and protected so that only the most devoted occult student or genuine seeker of inner truth will spot the hidden meanings for they have as it is said “Eyes to See” and “Ears to Hear” for they can “Read Between the Lines”. In this way a whole sub system of high level spiritual knowledge and wisdom is carefully preserved but available to all who have done the necessary preceding groundwork. The beginner can read the most advanced manual yet they will only pick up the surface meaning, whereas the Initiate or Adept will get quite a different meaning and interpretation depending upon their own level, previous experience and knowledge.”

Paul Dunne, ‘The Secret Twilight Language of the Occult Blinds’, Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia [ Archived here ]

THE MATHEMATICAL ODDS OF THESE ANOMALIES BEING COINCIDENTAL LESSEN WITH EACH CHAPTER…

READ ON THEN YOU DECIDE.